Consumer Reports took a beating for measuring the new iPad’s heat and charging non-issues under intense loads. However, it still overwhelmingly recommended Apple’s new device.
The biggest downfall?
Performance on the new iPad ($500 to $830) was superb in virtually every other way as well. The 5-megapixel camera took very good photos. Verizon’s 4G network yielded very fast, dependable connectivity to a 4G-compatible version of the iPad in our informal tests. And despite the energy-intensive display and graphics, the iPad still has longer battery life than all other tablets.
Responding to consumer comments on the new device, and to coverage from other reviewers, we also carried out further tests that confirmed the new iPad is warmer in its hottest spots than the iPad 2. But we didn’t find those temperatures to be cause for concern. In addition, further tests of observations we made that the new iPad was not recharging when playing a demanding, intense video game, showed that the problem was limited to times when the device was playing a demanding game with the screen fully bright. Our high overall judgment of the new iPad was not affected by the results of either battery of tests.
It said the new iPad’s display “does, in at least some applications, serve to magnify imperfections in content designed for lower screen resolution. For example, some text in e-magazines looks worse on the new device than on the iPad 2, as others, including PC World, have noted.”
So, because the display is so good, it makes content created for older displays look bad. Somehow, this is a downside? I checked; this was posted today, not yesterday.
- 5 reasons why the new iPad runs hotter than the old ones (9to5mac.com)
- New iPad as 25+ hour LTE hotspot, runs cooler than some Android tablets (9to5mac.com)
- Consumer Reports: New iPad hits 116 degrees running games,’very warm but not especially uncomfortable’ (9to5mac.com)
